Medical college a few days ago, my mind came to a halt on a subject that had been developing rapidly for some time. I decided to think about it, and it seemed worthy of a blog article.
Almost in 2010, the union ministry of health and the MCI collaborated on a proposal for a standard, universal ‘national exit test’ for Indian MBBS admission before practicing Medicine. The initiative had faced some criticism until lately when it gained attention and some ardent supporters. Before granting them a permanent registration to practice Medicine freely, the national exit test attempts to verify acceptable competence among graduates and a level of uniformity incompetence due to the various standards of medical instruction between schools.
Five Important things for MBBS:
- The length of the MBBS admission will be shortened from 4.5 to 3.5 years.
- The student should be given the option of choosing a specialty early on in their academic career and studying solely related topics.
- The MCI’s academic council will be given the authority to create any academic program in Medicine.
- The MCI will have its accrediting system for medical schools.
- For the remainder of this debate, we’ll focus on the first proposition.
To put it simply, the notion behind an examination is that you test something when you want it to fulfill a certain standard. And if you want something to meet a certain standard, you must be confident in the delivery system’s ability to fulfill that standard. Obviously, before considering an exit exam that assesses competency, we must be confident that our medical education system can produce appropriately competent MBBS doctors.
I reaffirm, as I have for a long time in various venues that today’s graduate MBBS training does not provide an appropriate practical approach and ability for practice and that additional time of training under supervision is required. The MBBS admission is badly in need of updating. To summarize, the theoretical part of the research has gotten far more attention than it deserves. If you look around medical colleges, you’ll notice that a significant amount of time is spent developing ways to pass the theory tests.
Assessments about MBBS:
Our assessments are formulaic and archetypal; they frequently require more tact than understanding. The quality of our practical training varies significantly between institutions, and there is frequently little stringency, quality control, or enforcement of the order in practical training. The student, the staff, and the examiners are frequently left to their own devices for practical instruction and evaluation. Furthermore, the year of mandatory rotating internship, which is critical for acquiring a global perspective in Medicine, is frequently consumed by repetitive work, pointless activities, and a chaotic setting that ensures little learning. With all of this in mind, the notion that just taking another exam will guarantee us universally and suitably qualified MBBS graduates seems hardly realistic. Why doesn’t the MCI address these flaws that lead to competence insufficiency before devising a competency assessment test? Isn’t that perplexing?
The goal of MBBS:
We can extend a similar discussion to the other goal of this exit test. The MCI’s academic council claims that the exit test will help to standardize the quality of doctors’ competence. Still, it says little about how to eliminate the standard discrepancy in the first place and ensure that every institution, regardless of administrative or social division, provides a defined, holy standard of medical instruction. How can such a test be functional enough before leveling the playing field between merit-based government institutions and private colleges that auction seats for millions of dollars?
In a way, a national exit test held in such an off-kilter setting will accomplish everything it can to expose the problems we confront while doing nothing to solve them. Then there are issues about the exam’s content. Is this going to be another standard multiple-choice exam? Or a well-known descriptive test, such as those used in university theoretical exams? Is it possible to compare the skill obtained via months of concentrated, meticulous medical training to preparing for and passing such a test?
Without a doubt, such a test will quickly become “just another exam” with questionable usefulness. It will envelop the deep gorge of inadequacy that has resulted from shoddy instruction in a threatening manner. And even if we create a near-ideal exit test that truly measures up to its claims, a significant number of our MBBS admissions may fail due to flaws in our educational system, causing havoc in the medical community.
Requirements for MBBS:
The requirements for admission to any of the medical colleges are nearly identical. An individual must have received a minimum of 50% in class 12th to be admitted to an undergraduate program. Aside from that, having Physics, Chemistry, and Biology as a subject is required. In terms of MBBS Admission 2013-14, the process has already begun. MBBS is an undergraduate degree program in Medicine and surgery. You can pursue a Doctor of Medicine (MD) or a Master of Surgery (MS) at the post-graduate level. MS/MD specialties include General Medicine, orthopedics, ENT, pediatrics, gynecology, radiotherapy, pathology, and others, all of which can be completed under the supervision of MCI.
A career in Medicine:
If you want to follow a job in Medicine, you can apply for MBBS admission this year. Various entrance examinations for MBBS admission are offered across the country. These competitive exams are held to fill the few places available in the MBBS program. On the other hand, the entrance criteria fluctuate from one part of the country to the next. An institution is assigned based on the merit obtained in the Entrance Tests. AIPMT, AIIMS, AFMC, AIPGDET, AIPVT, NEET (National Eligibility Entrance Test), and other organizations conduct medical entrance exams. NEET has grown in popularity in recent years, and it has aided many students in achieving their goals.
The only way to give significance to the national exit test picture is to address the fundamental difficulties in our medical education. Once it’s fixed, a single, nationwide exam like this would be a critical instrument for ensuring a clear standard of competence among doctors of varying skill levels, which is something we sorely need. International-trained Indian doctors will find a single test that examines both Indian and foreign graduates enticing and fulfilling. Similar examinations are used in the United States, Canada, Australia, and other countries, and they are performing admirably to their satisfaction.
Read More about SEO